Width, Manchester City’s biggest problem this season.


April 26, 2012 by Joshua Broomfield

Despite looking at one point like they would run away with the league title, Manchester City are currently in a position where their only hope of finishing above Manchester United looks like goal difference. Notwithstanding Lee Dixon’s exceptionally perceptive insight that football results are down to a combination of form, fitness and the teams on the pitch. What has been the reason for Manchester City seemingly throwing the title away? One of the most significant reasons is that they have often lacked width, and have consequently been, at times, easy to¬†frustrate. City’s default formation this season has been a 4-2-3-1/4-2-2-2: a back 4, two holding midfielders, two nominal wide players who drift inside and two strikers, one of which often will often drop deep to help in build up play. City’s rough first choice 11:

football formations

The strong point of this system is that it is extremely fluid in attacking phases and useful for dominating possession. City have the players to play that system effectively: Aguero, Silva, Nasri, Toure et al. are extremely intelligent footballers. Paradoxically, this strength has also been their weakness at times. Their fluidity comes at the expense of natural width, and with an organised compact defence they have, at times, struggled to break teams down. Accordingly, City’s shots have overwhelmingly been from central positions and a significant amount from outside the box.

Manchester City - Statistics

City’s primary play-makers are Silva and Nasri: with 13 and 9 respectively they have the most assists for City this season in the Premier League. Although they generally occupy the wide positions in City’s line-up, neither are true wide players; they drift into central areas and look to create chances from there:

Share - Stats Zone - FourFourTwo

The stats below illustrate how little City relies on crosses from wide positions:

Manchester City - Statistics

A concrete example of City’s lack of width is their recent game with Norwich.¬†The screenshot below shows a narrow City attacking a compact Norwich defence, with no one in wide positions outside the opposition full-backs (blue circles):

Norwich City 1 2013 6 Manchester City | FootyRoom - Latest Football Highlights

Consequently, with no direct opponents, Norwich’s full-backs were able to get into the game (albeit with limited effectiveness):

Share - Stats Zone - FourFourTwoWith their full-backs relatively free, Norwich’s goal came when Drury (Norwich’s left-back) created an overlap against Zabaleta:

Norwich City 1 2013 6 Manchester City | FootyRoom - Latest Football Highlights

Narrowness didn’t become to much of a problem for City on this occasion as they ran out 6-1 winners, but against stronger opposition their full-backs run the risk of being overwhelmed. For example, in their Champion’s League game away against Bayern, the latter created a number of chances from wide positions and their wide players (circled below) were able to have a significant influence on the game:

Share - Stats Zone - FourFourTwo

City’s lack of width has also meant they’ve come undone in the Premier League. They’ve recently dropped points against Stoke and Sunderland, who managed to frustrate them in the centre:

Share - Stats Zone - FourFourTwo

It therefore seems strange how little Adam Johnson has been used by Mancini, especially in big games. As a natural wide player he would counter-balance the narrowness of Silva and/or Nasri. Compared to them, he receives the ball overwhelmingly in wide positions:

Share - Stats Zone - FourFourTwo

It is not as though he has been ineffective this season: in 10 starts he has 6 goals and 2 assists in the Premier League. His seeming lack of favour with Mancini is inexplicable, and it’s a great shame that one of England’s best wide players is only a bit-part player at Manchester City. City have by no means had a bad season. At the time of writing they have 80 points, only 3 less than Manchester United. The Manchester Derby on Monday might prove to be crucial in deciding the title race.

If the majority of their team stays together – which there is no reason why they wouldn’t – then its hard not to see them dominating the Premier League for the next few seasons. However, it would make sense for Johnson to be more of a regular feature in the City team, to bring some much-needed width into their play.

  • Paul

    Nice article, but just a few points to make.

    Defensively width isn’t that large of a problem as Nasri or Silva are supposed to track any oncoming fullbacks whilst Toure or Barry/De Jong move over to double up on the winger. Our big problem against Norwichs full backs were created because of a lack of tracking and particularly by Zabs mad pressing routine. Richards much prefers to send people down the line, and allows that extra time for a midfielder to join in.

    Offensively, width is created by the full backs. Our build up phase takes much longer than other teams at home and our away tactic relies on direct through balls to Aguero or Tevez from Barry or even Kompany. This extra time allows those to make blind runs into space and stretch the compact defence and leave gaps for people to run into. Alternatively, they run inside themselves and make the defence break their shape.

    Whilst we don’t often utilise the flanks in that final touch situation, I don’t think you can pin much on this. Barca played a similar system and won leagues and CLs, it’s just an alternative way of playing. We generate width through full backs because our preferred eleven has four midgets up front. Balo isn’t good in the air, and Dzeko has lacked form even when playing with Johnson and Nasri so there is no reason to build a system around them. Our system is built around the majority of the team, which operate better threading intelligent passes around in the centre.

    Also, we’ve faced loads of teams this season who have packed the centre who we have broken down.

    • Totally, take your point about the full-backs: I did consider writing about how Richards in particular has provided good width (e.g. Against newcastle away). However, with Silva etc cutting in the full-backs don’t provide as many 2 v 1 situations.
      Also, I am by no means saying City’s system is failing: I think they are the best footballing team in the EPL. My main point is that a high focus on the centre can make them predictable and on occasions easy to frustrate. In those occasions Johnson perhaps is the obvious plan b that city need.

      • Paul

        I think that’s fair, but Johnson has been used as a sub in 16 games this year so he does sometimes get that opportunity. The interesting thing about the Tevez return though is how it has changed our play to be much less predictable in attack, and allows Aguero to help provide some width when he runs into the left channel.

        I suppose the idea is that a four of Tevez, Aguero, Silva and Nasri have enough intelligence in their off the ball movement to create that space whereas Balotelli and Dzekos runs are a little more predictable.

        We did chase Sanchez this year and are linked with Bale again so it certainly seems like something that City want to address

Creative Commons License